jump to navigation

Been thinking about the best next career? June 24, 2009

Posted by hardly Strategic Concerns, career, jobs Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

I've had a number of conversations with people of late regarding the economy, their career, and what the future may hold for them.



One thing I've always heard about the future is that it is tough to predict. But not impossible.


Today's NYT has a highly thought-provoking article about jobs that are in demand right now(MBAs with no real-world experience need not apply). Definitely worth the read.


As to the future, these roles may well point the way towards your next career. All of these rolls have common elements: hands-on, long time to gain the necessary experience to be good enough, and focused on areas that were known to be needed at least 5 years ago based on demographic needs. 


For software development, and technologists in general, I keep wondering about how we create better products for an aging population that, based on death rates, will trend more female. How about specializing in UX for those over 50? 

Be Bold! June 11, 2009

Posted by hardly Resumes, career Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

There are so many ways to make your resume stand out.



For example, use an Objective Section.


You can also include short recommendations from key supervisors in your career.


And, of course, you should include a line or two at the end of each career entry to detail the technology used, such as: Java, Javascript, CSS, HTML, MySQL, Linux, C++


You should, of course, make the resume short. And use declarative sentences.


And above all, BOLD random words. Because that's what all the best developers do to help the really dumb recruiters see all the key items on their resume.


- or -


Focus on clean, crisp formatting. It makes it easier to pick up the phone and call you.

One thing you can learn traveling to Salt Lake City May 21, 2009

Posted by hardly Travel, career Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

Yesterday, I made a 1-day excursion to Salt Lake City.

Before I left, I lost my Driver's License. I did not know this at the time.

You know how there are some things in your life that have bad ju ju, so you usually avoid them? Well, New Year's Eve and Salt Lake City are mine. Which is not to say the primary mission of my trip was a failure, far from it. But, the stuff happening on the sidelines was, um, attention-getting.

For instance:

The one thing? Don't leave your driver's license or passport behind.

All Apologies April 24, 2009

Posted by hardly Strategic Concerns, career, tom peters Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

Tom Peters has what looks like a great post about the skill of apology. In it, he cites a new book (release date 5/1) by John Kador, Effective Apology: Mending Fences, Building Bridges, and Restoring Trust.



I've not read this book, and it looks good. Going to add it to my ever-growing list of must-reads.


This book, along with stumbling into a couple of situations from my long-ago past made me think hard about this topic. Here's the thing: When it comes corporate apologies, they have to occur in an environment where everyone is on-board with the apology. And, in addition to the apology, the company in question HAS to take action to address the base cause of the error as fast as possible. 


Were I the CEO, I'd have one or two people I'd turn to in these cases, just to make sure there is no weaseling around going on with either the apology, or the actions. 


Aside from being good corporate advice, what does this have to do with you, the job hunter? Simple. Your brand will irrevocably be tied to your employers. Before you accept a given job at a given company, check out the stumbles the company has made, and see if you're O.K. with their response. If not, add that to 'Against' column on your For & Against list.

Which economy are you in? April 23, 2009

Posted by hardly AP, Strategic Concerns, career, jobs, work Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

There is no question that we live in a very interesting time.



First, there's all the bad, mainly macro-economic news. You've heard or read about most of it: Mortgage-backed securities, construction collapse, zombie-banks, bailouts, auto industry collapse, etc.


Then, there are instances of other aspects of our economy.


For example, the AP reported today about a bill in Texas that approved incentives to graduate more nurses. Because there's a nursing shortage.


Another example - I know of two people who landed new roles within very reasonable search time-frames. The common elements? They were Software Developers. In Seattle.


Recommendation to all those college-aged kids out there: Medicine, Computer Science. Oh, and Food!

I agree… April 6, 2009

Posted by hardly Penelope Trunk, Strategic Concerns, career, jobs, work Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

One of the things that always struck me odd are Women in Software Engineering groups. It's not that I don't agree with the notion that it's hard for women in software engineering, but to say that gives the notion that it's easy for the guys, which is BS. It's hard for everyone, because the leaders are just as screwed up for the girl as for the guys, and more to the point, everyone is different. So, your point of view about a given problem/situation will necessarily be different than anyone else's, regardless of your sex.

So, it's not surprise that Penelope Trunk's article, The G-20 is Complete BS for Women, really struck a chord for me. It makes one think twice about long-cherished views regarding women and men in the workplace.

Who do you put in charge? April 1, 2009

Posted by hardly Cringely, Strategic Concerns, career, jobs, work Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

Wonderful article to read on April Fool's Day by Bob Cringely about the 3 Mile Island nuclear accident.

He's got some great points:

And by me saying these things doesn't take anything away from reading it. Great post, methinks.

With the chickens having come to roost in so many companies, and CxOs getting zapped left and right for good reason, we have to conclude that something is wrong in our selection process for the leaders of our companies. Not all companies, certainly, but enough that one should start saying "hmm".

When you go to work today, or when you decide to invest in a new company with you hard-earned savings, or when you look at working for a new firm, maybe you should think a bit about what makes your leader your leader.

re: Tell me what it’s going to take to hire you… March 31, 2009

Posted by hardly HR Capitalist, Job Hunt Process, career, jobs, work Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

HR Capitalist gives some good advice regarding the whole question of revealing your salary history.

Now, I know there are those among you who don't want to talk about salary until the end of the recruiting process. You think it should be the last thing to do before accepting the offer.

In thinking about this frame, I circle back to many of the business deals I've been involved in. In every case, there is always a discussion of the price range up front. Otherwise, how do you know if you should continue the discussion, engage in all the people internally that are needed to make the deal happen?

Exactly.

In line with Kris's thinking, be prepared to have the discussion regarding the range, but don't assume that's the end of the discussion. It's just the start.

p.s. Yes, I'm still one for understanding the outcomes, statistically from all the approaches to this problem.

re: The real reason employers want your salary… March 30, 2009

Posted by hardly Ask the Headhunter, HR Capitalist, Job Hunt Process, SHRM, career, jobs, work Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

Nick continues to beat the drum on your salary as part of the hiring process, and good for him! And, HR Capitalist has a pretty good idea about how HR should approach the general problem that asking for Salary during the interview process.

Getting back to Nick's post, he points out something that few employees, let alone employers think about. However, some parts of a company do, and it works like this:

In other words, most companies think about their payroll & benefits costs exactly the same way the finance industry thinks about mortgage backed securities. You know, those things that helped bring down our economy?

Put it this way, the benefits and risks for any one employee don't actually show up in most financial calculations about the company, just like the risks & rewards for a mortgage loan that is part of a mortgage backed security.

OOPS!

Given the failures we've seen in the financial sector, this is a place I'd love all those heavy thinkers at SHRM to spend some cycles making better stuff happen for us. I think they're about to not have to worry so much about a unionized workplace.

The challenges with Affiliation March 26, 2009

Posted by hardly HR Capitalist, Other, career, jobs, work Digg! this story! Digg! this story. , add a comment

One of the threads out there in blog-land and periodical-land is that HR Cannot Be Trusted.

HR Capitalist has a nice post about trusting the person, not the HR organization.

All this hubbub points out an interesting problem that we all face at some point in our career: You are affiliated with a group that's got brand challenges. So, what do you do?

New name?

New processes (New math? New Metrics?)?

Change what your org does?

Change how your org interfaces within the company?

Any, all. Just don't stand there like a bump in the road!